Home » Software

Category Archives: Software

RISA 3D v15 and RISA Floor v11 and more

RISA has a new release of software with several enhancements including the most recent code, IBC 2015, being implemented to the program. 

Tekla Structural Designer 2016i

TSD continues to expand its abilities now adding mat and tile foundation design with 2016i update

ETABS 2016 and PT analysis

CSI released a new version of ETABS with concrete slab design with post-tensioned also being able to be modeled. This new version makes ETABS the first major 3D FEA program with the ability of modeling PT effects. We at FORSE find this to be a significant enhancement to the ability to perform more accurate analysis and design for the full 3D effects of PT.

The Analyses of RAM Structural System

Are you a user of the software program RAM Structural System? Are you aware that the program runs different analyses in different parts of the programs, and those results from the analyses are available to select areas of the program?

Throughout the RAM Structural System there are three distinct types of analysis performed in each module. The results of the different analysis types may differ slightly because of the different assumptions within each method. Here is a breakdown of the different analysis types.
To see where these analyses are available throughout the program, please see RAM’s Load and Forces
RAM Steel. When a model is designed using either of the RAM Steel modules (Steel Beam or Steel Column), the program performs a simple tributary analysis which we refer to as the “framing tables”. To determine the loads, the program calculates the tributary areas and attributes gravity loads to each member based on the applied surface, line and point loads in the model. The reactions of a beam framing to another beam, or a beam framing to a column are calculated based on the assumption that all members are simply-supported, determinate members with exactly two supports. Live loads are reduced according to the code rules and the particular member tributary area. Specifically, the things that are not considered in this type of analysis are:
1. No end fixity considered (all members considered to be pinned ended). 2. No braces. 3. No lateral loads. 4. No deformation of the supports is considered. 5. Walls will transfer gravity loads straight down to supporting members but the loads are not distributed or spread out in any way due to the strength/stiffness of the wall.
RAM Frame. Here the program performs a full 3-dimensional analysis. The reactions of gravity members being supported by lateral members are calculated as in the Steel modules. Then these reactions are applied to the lateral members as point loads. Otherwise, the gravity members are completely ignored in the RAM Frame analysis. Rigid diaphragms are assumed to connect the vertical frames together, but the user has control over this. The program can also consider rigid end zones and second-order, P-Delta effects. Lateral static loads can be applied in addition to the gravity loads. These lateral loads can be applied as diaphragm forces when rigid diaphragms are used, or they may be applied as nodal loads. Dynamic response spectra analysis can also be performed. This is the only module that investigates lateral load cases. Specifically, the things that are not considered in this type of analysis are:
1. No gravity members considered (other than reactions on frame members). 2. No skip loading, except for the separation of negative (upward) live loads
from downward forces.

RAM Concrete. Here the program is attempting to perform a more elaborate analysis of the concrete structure for gravity loads. Every single member is considered in the analysis, and concrete gravity members will now be analyzed using the assigned end fixity (presumably fixed-ended). The program has the option to skip load the live loads to account for the worst pattern of load for the design of each member. Another analysis option which differs from RAM Frame is to reduce the torsional stiffness of the concrete members.
Because this method is much more involved, the program analyzes only one floor at a time. The column and wall reactions of the top floor are determined and then added to the lower floor analysis as loads. Consequently, some overall 3-dimensional effects (Vierendeel truss behavior) may be neglected in this form of analysis. Consider the example where an upper level frame has one column supported by a lower level beam, and the other column continues to the ground. In reality, the continuous column will attract somewhat more than of the gravity load, but the RAM Concrete program, when analyzing the top level will recognize the two columns to have the same stiffness and will attribute the same load to each. Only the full 3D analysis of RAM Frame can capture these overall effects, and this is why the program has the option to consider either the gravity load results from the RAM Frame analysis or the gravity load results from the RAM Concrete analysis when designing lateral concrete members. Specifically, the things that are not considered in this type of analysis are:
1. No overall 3-D effects. 2. No braces. 3. No lateral loads.

RAM Foundation. The RAM Foundation program doesn’t actually perform a separate analysis, but there is an option within the program to choose which gravity load results should be considered for the design of foundations supporting gravity columns. The foundation design forces may utilize either the RAM Steel (simple tributary analysis) or the RAM Concrete results (but not the RAM Concept option for forces). All forces for lateral members come from RAM Frame.

RAM Concept. RAM Concept is a separate application which also performs a finite element analysis of a single floor of a concrete structure. It is mentioned here because there is an option in RAM Concrete to substitute the RAM Concept column reactions from dead loads, live loads and balance loads (i.e. post tensioning effects) in the RAM Concrete Column design routines in lieu of the RAM Concrete analysis results.

SCIA Engineer 2014 released

A new version of SCIA Engineer has been released, as well as an updated version of Design Forms

SCIA Design Forms

At FORSE, we are currently creating calculations in SCIA Design Forms. We think SCIA is going to make a large impact in the structural engineering design community by empowering users to create there own calculations for applying design checks to results from an FEA. Form more information, see http://nemetschek-scia.com/en/software/product-selection/scia-design-forms

new version of ETABS

since I started FORSE, over 3 years ago, there have been rumors of a new ETABS version with all kinds of enhancements. well, it appears that new version is here: http://www.csiberkeley.com/etabs2013

NEW RISA 3D and RISA Floor

The new versions include all updated material codes per the IBC 2012, such as ACI 530-11 (ASD & Strength) masonry code. Very nice update!

Software Reviews

Hello and welcome to the FORSEi software review page. Thank you for your interest, and we hope you find the information useful as you assess the structural engineering software programs we have reviewed.

Thank you,
Sam Rubenzer.

RAM Programs released

Bentley Systems have released new versions of popular RAM programs:

RAM Structural System V8i r14.5 – new integration with RAM Concept including the ability to launch RAM Concept from with RSS, and a completely re-built RAM Frame program.

RAM Concept V8i r5.0: new features, including the new integration with RSS

RAM Elements V8i r13: new merge model command

Powered by WordPress / Academica WordPress Theme by WPZOOM